Influence of Faculty Management Practices on Training of Quality Graduates in the Universities in Kenya
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70619/vol2iss1pp14-22Keywords:
Faculty Management Practices, Training, Quality GraduatesAbstract
Training of quality graduates depends on how management practices in faculty management among other factors are addressed by each university. The researcher recognizes that there are different management practices applied at different levels in universities with a view to training quality graduates. However, this study focused on management practices applied by universities to support faculty in the training of quality graduates. The study followed the descriptive design in presenting the literature on faculty management practices. The data collection was based on a questionnaire developed to determine the influence of identified faculty management practices on the training of quality graduates in the universities. The participants were 120 university faculty members chosen from different universities in Kenya. Results were statistically analyzed using SPSS. The study established that there are significant differences across universities in adopting faculty managements practices in supporting faculty management practices that promote training and development across the Universities. Universities were noted to lack commitment to conduct regular training to meet the pedagogical needs of the faculty and also provide inadequate opportunities for career growth. Similarly, it was observed that most universities lacked comprehensive motivation and reward systems. This led to diminishing faculty commitment, high staff turnover, and relatively demotivated faculty.
References
Birasnav, M. (2014) Knowledge Management and Organizational Performance in the Service Industry: The Role of Transformational Leadership Beyond the Effects of Transactional Leadership. Journal of Business Research, 67, 1622-1629.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.09.006
Bloom, N., &Reenen, J. (2010). Why do management practices differ across firms and countries? The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 24(1), 203-224. https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/jep.24.1.203
Bogt, H. J., & Scapens, R. W. (2012). Performance management in universities: Effects of the transition to more quantitative measurement systems. European Accounting Review, 21(3), 451-497. Doi: 10.1080/09638180.2012.668323
Bruce, J. B. R., & Calhoun, E., (2010). Models of learning: Tools for teaching (3rded.). Buckingham: Open University Press.
Bruce, J., & Calhoun, E. (2015). Beyond professional development: Breaking Boundaries and Liberating a Learning Profession. Journal of Staff Development, 36(6), 42-46. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1085500
Bull, G. & Anstey, M. (2010b). Using the Principles of Multiliteracies to inform Pedagogical Change.In, D.R Cole & D.L. Pullen, Multiliteracies in Motion (pp. 141–159). London: Taylor and Francis.
CUE (2014) Universities standards and guidelines. Nairobi: Commission for University Education.
Hattie, J. & Yates, C. G. (2013). Visible Learning and the Science of How We Learn. London: Routledge
Henk, J. B., & Robert, W. S. (2011). Performance Management in Universities: Effects of the Transition to More Quantitative Measurement Systems. European Accounting Review journal, 21(3), 451-497. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2012.668323
Inter-University Council of East Africa. (2014). Quality of Graduates in Africa. https://www.insidehighered.com/blogs/world-view/quality-graduates-africa
Lipman, V. (2015). The Type B Manager: Leading Successfully in a type a world. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Press.
McCarthy, M. (2015). Reflections on the evolution of educational leadership preparation programs in the United States and challenges ahead. Journal of Educational Administration, 53(3), 416-438. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-03-2014-0045