Government Taxation and Growth of Large Manufacturing Firms in Nairobi City County, Kenya Registered with Kenya Association of Manufacturers

Authors

  • Eunice Kagwiria Kalwigi Kenyatta University
  • Dr Fredrick Warui Kenyatta University
  • Dr Farida Abdul Kenyatta University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70619/vol5iss1pp22-33

Keywords:

Government Taxation, Growth, Large Manufacturing Firms, Kenya Association of Manufacturers

Abstract

Purpose: This article explores the intricate relationship between government taxation and the growth of large manufacturing firms. Specific objectives of this study were to investigate effect of corporate income taxes, excise duty taxes and custom duty taxes on growth of large manufacturing firms. Finally, to examine moderating effect of firm size on the relationship between government taxations and growth of large manufacturing firms.

Methods: The research was guided descriptive research design with secondary data obtained from audited financial statements. The researcher employed stratified and systematic sampling to select 73 organizations from Nairobi City County's large manufacturing firms for the study. Panel data analysis was employed.

Results: The findings indicated that corporate income taxes had a negative and significant effect on growth of manufacturing firms (β=-0.002, p=0.045); excise duty taxes had a positive and significant effect on growth of manufacturing firms (β=0.004, p=0.000); and custom duty taxes had a positive and significant effect on growth of manufacturing firms (β=0.005, p=0.005). Further, the interaction between government taxations and firm size had a negative and significant effect on growth of large manufacturing firms in Kenya (β=-0.0028, p=0.000). 

Conclusion: The study found that corporate taxes positively impact growth, as higher taxes correspond with increased income and tax contributions from rapidly growing firms. The relationship between excise duty and growth was positive but not statistically significant, suggesting little effect on large manufacturing firms. The study recommends maintaining current corporate tax rates for large manufacturers, as they do not impede growth. Policymakers should consider the minimal effects of these taxes when designing fiscal policies, and future research could investigate other tax-related factors. Additionally, firms are encouraged to expand their asset bases to enhance investment potential, improve funding security, and achieve economies of scale.

Author Biography

Eunice Kagwiria Kalwigi, Kenyatta University

Department of Accounting and Finance

References

Abiahu, M. &. (2020). Effect of Corporate Tax on Sustainable Financial Performance of Listed Firms in Nigeria. Journal of Taxation and Economic Development. , 19(1), 50-63.

Chigbu, E. E., & Eze, L. (2012). An empirical study on the causality between economic growth and taxation in Nigeria. Current Research Journal of Economic Theory, 4(2), 29-38.

Eneisik, G. E., Obara, L. C., & Uwikor, M. K. (2023). Effect of companies’ income tax on financial performance of listed manufacturing companies in Nigeria. Int J Econ Financ Manage, 8, 25-49.

Julius Opiso, S. K. (2022). Impact of Petroleum Excise Tax Costs on Firm Productivity in Uganda. Journal of Energy Research and Reviews, 36-51.

Kalsum, U. (2022). Determinants of Earnings Management in Food and Beverage Sector Companies in Indonesian. Atestasi: Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi, 5(1), 197-211.

Kenya Association of Manufacturers. (2021). Manufacturing in Kenya Under the ‘Big 4 Agenda’ https://khf.co.ke/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/KAM-Manufacturing-Deep-Dive-Report-2018.pdf

Kenya Association of Manufacturers. (2022). Manufacturing Priority Agenda (MPA). https://kam.co.ke/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/KAM-Priority-Agenda-2019-Abridged-version.pdf

Kenya Association of Manufacturers. (2024). Manufacturing Priority Agenda (MPA). https://kam.co.ke/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/MANUFACTURING-PRIORITY-AGENDA-MPA-2024.pdf

KNBS (2021). https://www.knbs.or.ke/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Kenya-quarterly-gross-domestic-product-first-quarter-2021.pdf

Mankiw, N. G. (2000). The savers–spenders theory of fiscal policy. American Economic Review, 90(2), 120-125.

Mirrlees, J. A. (1976). The optimal structure of incentives and authority within an organization. The Bell Journal of Economics, 105-131.

Mwangi, G. M., & Gitau, R. (2022). Effect of Custom Duty Incentives on Financial Performance of Manufacturing Companies in Kenya. European Journal of Economic and Financial Research, 6(4).

OECD (2019).Tackling Policy Challenges Through Public Sector Innovationhttps://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2022/11/tackling-policy-challenges-through-public-sector-innovation_49144212/052b06b7-en.pdf

Ombati, K. (2021). Effect of Multiple Taxation on Financial Performance of Manufacturing Firms Listed at the Nairobi Securities Exchange (Doctoral dissertation).

Oyinkansola, G. A. A., & Omodero, C. O. (2023). Impact of statutory audit and corporate taxation on profitability of selected listed companies in Nigeria. Cogent Economics & Finance, 11(1), 2199552.

Richard, J. (2023). Taxation and its impact on the performance of large industrial enterprises in Kenya.

Signé, L. (2018). The Potential of Manufacturing and Industrialization in Africa: Trends, Opportunities, and Strategies.

Smith, A., & Johnson, B. (2022). The impact of customs duties on local industries: Balancing protection and competitiveness.

UNIDO. (2020). Industrial development report. Industrialization in the digital age.

Zeufack, N. a. (2019). Manufacturing in structural change in Africa. World Bank Policy Research Working, No:8992.

Downloads

Published

2025-01-17

How to Cite

Kalwigi, E. K. ., Warui, D. F. ., & Abdul, D. F. . (2025). Government Taxation and Growth of Large Manufacturing Firms in Nairobi City County, Kenya Registered with Kenya Association of Manufacturers. Journal of Finance and Accounting, 5(1), 22–33. https://doi.org/10.70619/vol5iss1pp22-33

Issue

Section

Articles