Relationship Between Corporate Governance and Financial Performance of MFIs in Kenya

Authors

  • Sila Florence Ndinda Maseno University
  • Benjamin Ombok Maseno University
  • Phillip Adoyo Maseno University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70619/vol6iss7pp16-28-898

Keywords:

Corporate governance, financial performance, Board Remuneration

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to establish the relationship between corporate governance, proxied by the compensation package provided to members of the board of directors, and the financial performance of Micro Finance Institutions (MFIs) in Kenya for the period 2015 to 2022, during which the trend revealed inconsistencies, with a major decline in years between 2015 and 2022. The study employed a correlational research design within a quantitative framework. The target population comprised the 14 deposit-taking MFIs licensed by the Central Bank of Kenya during the study period. However, only 12 institutions had complete audited financial statements covering the entire period from 2015 to 2022. Therefore, all 12 eligible institutions were included in the analysis, while the remaining two were excluded because of incomplete data. Data were analysed using STATA statistical software. Regression results have indicated a significant negative relationship between corporate governance and financial performance (β = -15.497, p = 0.000). The null hypothesis was rejected, indicating that corporate governance has a statistically significant and negative effect on the financial performance of MFIs in Kenya. Specifically, a one-unit increase in board remuneration was associated with a 15.497-unit decline in Return on Assets, suggesting that excessive director compensation reduces rather than enhances financial performance in this context. This may be attributed to the persistent losses experienced by Kenyan deposit-taking MFIs during much of the study period, where higher board remuneration increased governance costs and consumed financial resources that could otherwise have been invested in lending operations, technological innovation, branch expansion, risk management systems, staff development, and customer acquisition. The adjusted coefficient of determination (Adjusted R² = 0.308739) indicated that board remuneration explained approximately 30.87% of the variation in financial performance among the sampled MFIs. The study concludes that board remuneration constitutes an important corporate governance variable in explaining financial performance among deposit-taking MFIs in Kenya. The study recommends that MFI management should review board remuneration structures to ensure that directors' compensation is aligned with institutional financial performance and long-term sustainability, since excessive board remuneration was found to have a significant negative effect on financial performance.

Author Biography

Sila Florence Ndinda, Maseno University

Department of Accounting and Finance

References

Aaron, J. R. (2013). Structuring Board of Directors’ Compensation Contracts: An Optimal Incentives Perspective. American Journal of Business and Management, 2(2), 130-142.

Abebe Zelalem, B., Ali Abebe, A., & Wodajo Bezabih, S. (2022). Corporate governance and financial performance in the emerging economy: The case of Ethiopian insurance companies. Cogent Economics & Finance, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2022.2117117

Ajeigbe, K. B., & Ganda, F. (2023). The implications of the pandemic for the corporate governance, remuneration and sustainability performance of South African listed companies. International Journal of Innovative Research and Scientific Studies, 6(1), 174-184.

Aluoch, M. O., Mwangi, C. I., Kaijage, E. S., & Ogutu, M. (2018). The relationship between board structure and the performance of firms listed on the Nairobi Securities Exchange. European Scientific Journal, 16(19), 337-364.

Barde, I. (2020). Effect of executive compensation and share ownership on financial performance of listed deposit money banks in Nigeria. Journal of Accounting and Taxation.

Bebchuk, L. A., & Fried, J. M. (2004). Pay without performance: The unfulfilled promise of executive compensation. Harvard University Press.

Core, J. E., Holthausen, R. W., & Larcker, D. F. (1999). Corporate governance, chief executive officer compensation, and firm performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 51(3), 371–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(98)00058-0

Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301–325. https://doi.org/10.1086/467037

Grossman, S. J., & Hart, O. D. (1982). Corporate financial structure and managerial incentives. In J. J. McCall (Ed.), The economics of information and uncertainty (pp. 107–140). University of Chicago Press.

Grossman, S. J., & Hart, O. D. (1986). The costs and benefits of ownership: A theory of vertical and lateral integration. Journal of Political Economy, 94(4), 691–719. https://doi.org/10.1086/261404

Harris, M., & Raviv, A. (1991). The theory of capital structure. The Journal of Finance, 46(1), 297–355. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1991.tb03753.x

Javed, A., & Khan, F. (2023). An Overview of Microfinance Institutions and Related Developments in Pakistan. Journal of Development Policy Research and Practice (JoDPRP), 7(1), 1-30.

Jensen, M. C. (1986). Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. American Economic Review, 76(2), 323–329.

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X

Jensen, M. C., & Murphy, K. J. (1990). Performance pay and top-management incentives. Journal of Political Economy, 98(2), 225–264. https://doi.org/10.1086/261677

Kariuki, F. W., & Muriithi, R. W. (2024). Effect of proactiveness on the growth of microfinance institutions in Murang’a County, Kenya. International Academic Journal of Economics and Finance, 4(1), 435-454.

Korankye, B. (2020). The collapse of microfinance institutions in Ghana: Causes and implications. International Journal of Finance and Banking Research. 10(2).

La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1999). Corporate ownership around the world. The Journal of Finance, 54(2), 471–517. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00115

Masuka, A. (2019). An analysis of the rural finance market in Zimbabwe: The case of Chipinge district, Manicaland province.

Mboe, A., & Kavale, S. (2023). Credit management and financial performance of micro-financial institutions in Mombasa County, Kenya. The Strategic Journal of Business & Change Management, 10(4), 261.

Özer, G., Aktaş, N. and Merter, A. K. (2024). The remuneration-performance relationshıp in corporate governance: Evidence from board members’ remuneration and firm performance. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 25(2), 231-248, DOI: 10.31671/doujournal.1329041.

Ruparelia, R. V., & Njuguna, A. G. (2016). Relationship between board remuneration and financial performance in the Kenyan financial services industry.

Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1986). Large shareholders and corporate control. Journal of Political Economy, 94(3), 461–488. https://doi.org/10.1086/261385

Ssekiziyivu, B., Mwesigwa, R., Bananuka, J., & Kaawaase, T. (2018). Corporate governance practices in Ugandan microfinance institutions. Cogent Business & Management, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2018.1488508

Downloads

Published

2026-08-14

How to Cite

Ndinda, S. F. ., Ombok, B. ., & Adoyo, P. . (2026). Relationship Between Corporate Governance and Financial Performance of MFIs in Kenya. Journal of Finance and Accounting, 6(7), 16–28. https://doi.org/10.70619/vol6iss7pp16-28-898

Issue

Section

Articles