Green Public Procurement in Africa: A Comparative Study of Nigeria, Kenya, and South Africa’s Priority Sectors
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70619/vol6iss1pp17-25-754Keywords:
Green Public Procurement, sustainable development, public procurement reform, environmental policy, Sub-Saharan Africa, comparative analysisAbstract
Green Public Procurement (GPP) is increasingly recognized as a vital tool for advancing sustainable development in Africa. This paper compares GPP frameworks in Nigeria, Kenya, and South Africa, focusing on key sectors such as energy, transportation, construction, and ICT. Using survey data from 287 procurement professionals, policymakers, and sustainability officers, the study analyzes the legal, institutional, and operational aspects of GPP across countries. South Africa leads with a mature, well-coordinated system, while Nigeria and Kenya face challenges related to fragmented implementation and weak monitoring. The research highlights the importance of political will, agency collaboration, supplier development, and international support as drivers of successful GPP. The findings offer practical recommendations to harmonize policy and foster sustainable procurement across Africa.
References
African Union. (2015). Agenda 2063: The Africa we want. African Union Commission.
Altenburg, T., & Assmann, C. (Eds.). (2017). *Green industrial policy: Concept, policies, country experiences*. German Development Institute/UN Environment.
Börzel, T. A., & Risse, T. (2010). Governance without a state: Can it work? Regulation & Governance, 4(2), 113-134.
Bureau of Public Procurement. (2018). National policy on public procurement. Federal Republic of Nigeria.
Carter, C. R., & Rogers, D. S. (2008). A framework of sustainable supply chain management: Moving toward a new theory. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 38(5), 360-387.
Department of Energy. (2019). Integrated resource plan 2019. Republic of South Africa.
European Commission. (2008). Public procurement for a better environment. COM (2008) 400 final.
Grandia, J. (2016). Finding the missing link: Examining the mediating role of sustainable public procurement behavior. Journal of Cleaner Production, 124, 183-190.
Grandia, J., Steinmeijer, M., & Boes, J. (2013). Effective commitment to sustainability in public procurement: The Dutch approach. International Journal of Procurement Management, 6(4), 407-429.
Li, J., & Geiser, K. (2012). Environmentally responsible public procurement and its implications for comprehensive environmental policy. Environmental Management, 49(4), 913-923.
McCrudden, C. (2004). Using public procurement to achieve social outcomes. Natural Resources Forum, 28(4), 257-267.
Meeus, M. T. H., & Verboven, F. C. (2012). Green public procurement: An overview of EU experience. European Commission.
National Treasury. (2017). Preferential procurement policy framework act: Preferential procurement regulations, 2017. Government Gazette No. 40553.
National Treasury. (2021). Green public procurement: Implementation toolkit. Office of the Chief Procurement Officer.
OECD. (2019). Government at a glance 2019. OECD Publishing.
Public Procurement Regulatory Authority. (2020). Annual report 2019-2020. Republic of Kenya.
Testa, F., Iraldo, F., & Frey, M. (2016). The effect of environmental regulation on firms' competitive performance: The case of the building & construction sector in some EU regions. Journal of Environmental Management, 92(10), 2136-2144.
UNEP. (2012). The 10-year framework of programmes on sustainable consumption and production patterns. United Nations Environment Programme.
United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. UN Publishing.
Walker, H., & Brammer, S. (2009). Sustainable procurement in the United Kingdom public sector. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 14(2), 128-137.
World Bank. (2020). Benchmarking public procurement 2020. World Bank Group.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Adedokun A Adebowale

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.